lemontree

i've watched this at least twice a day since i posted it... and it is just not getting old. TTTTTTTTTING TING TING TA TING TING TA TING TING

so allegedly (i.e. according to wikipedia) he ISN'T gay whoknew~!

TING TING TING TA TING TING TING TA TING TING

if you want a better breakdown: the pony strippers don't have tattoos, but their shooter girls can. to my understanding, their shooter girls are a little more reigned in than the oasis ones the oasis strippers are generally tattoo-riddled, and their shooter girls basically give lap dances for the cost of the shot the clermont is an abomination against god and should be burned to the ground

my friend works at the pony, he says it's nice and the chicks are reasonably hot the oasis is ok but it's so dark, kinda hard to look at titties when you need a flashlight

this is a boldfaced lie >< i've seen "it" and i wish i could erase that night from my eyeballs

please learn the "fork in the garbage disposal" by the winter party. if all of you would get in a line and do that... i would pee from sheer joy. then i may possibly howl. much <3, lemon ***NSFW - has some colorful language

lulz@wow

i need to think a little while about igor's wall of text before i say anything substantial for now i leave you with this http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/political-pictures-italian-air-force-fabulous.jpg

you eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

i think some of the reactions to your statement were a little strong. you were voicing an opinion. you weren't like OMG ALL FAGS DIE IN HELL LOLOLOL which is quite good ^^ but yeah, you're in the minority up in these parts subjects like these will always invoke strong reactions, especially from those that feel shit on by certain people's opinions

; ;

i know, it kind of died please don't make me do real actual work today http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/political-pictures-sign-straight1.jpg

i might want to fight about it, i'm in that kind of mood today getting a trial account would indicate that i ever have a desire to log into this shitbox game again, which isn't the case. back on track VIVA LA HOMO it's LA right, cause y'all are fabulosoa?

k two things you can't find me, i've been banned also, are you calling me a he? heads are fixin to roll

marriage is what happens when two people are stupid enough to think that they can be together forever (please excuse my cynicism as an ongoing divorce has soured my views on marriage). LEGALLY i think marriage should be two people willing to join households (powers? omg captain planet) and have rights given to them that have been previously discussed at length i don't see the point in trying to define marriage only in a religious sense. why do we need a new word for the legal definition? it's the same damn thing, just some people don't want to share with the homos love is a chemical imbalance. if i said i KNEW what it was, i'd be lying my ass off, as would most of us i imagine BABY DON'T HURT ME NO MO OOOOOO OHH OHHAWAAAAOOOO WAAAAOOOO~

^ this YAY HOMOS ILU wouldn't a gay wedding be the most off the chain sh!t you've ever been to? i hope i get to see one in my lifetime

i guess if you add up matt and ryee's posts it might make 2% BUT THEY'RE GAY SO IT COUNTS LESS AMIRITE? jokes for once i actually agree with gg, it's civil rights. religion should have nothing to do with it at all.

i still don't see why, nothing bad is happening here. it's 99% healthy debate and 1% outburst.

i only see one remotely non-civil reply. what's his face has the right to say whatever backwards junk he wants, we have the right to tell him how we feel also. ryee has a point, so does what's his face (wtf is his name it's not showing on this page anymore, thruster?). yes, i think his opinion is ignorant and misguided and even retarded, but it's his opinion and he has a right to it. ryee has a right to his opinion to, and if he wants to express his opinion and say that he'd gkick this guy, then in my opinion he has every right to say so. it's just talk.

religious according to who? i had no mention of any god at all when i got married. at its base, marriage is a legal contract. why shouldn't the gays get a legal contract as well? pulled from http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/marriage In 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which, for federal purposes, defined marraige as "only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" (1 U.S.C. § 7). DOMA further provided that "No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship" (28 U.S.C. § 1738C). (See Conflict of laws, Constitutional law) that isn't the pope, it's a law. my absolute rejection of god in any form probably lends a hand to my view on this, but that's my story and i'm stickin to it edited for typos!

"We need to recognize that a government that would deny a gay man the right to bridal registry is a fascist state." — Margaret Cho

ohai besieged

man, i don't know... maybe i don't have enough female friends to subscribe to that newsletter dick is pretty neat!

GO TEAM HOMO http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/political-pictures-closet.jpg punditkitchen.com makes me lulz