loofa

hi

Matches

[insert picture of hot guy]

You'd be amazed, Darcy, at the small places where two large things will fit.

Let me know how it is. It looks really neat from the video I've seen.

view more here http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2029...mp;l=3d433fe60c

there I posted it huge, can someone else fix it? i don't have time.

*Fixed - Stang*

Raw Material Quality Control in a mat manufacturing company.

I've got stories but shit happens. . .

The spacing on the two words under "concentrated power" had me reading this the wrong way. I wrote a nice later telling All about this. http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/6204/allfreeclearuselessmf7.jpg

lol

Happy 27th Matt! I love you tons!!

There are always clauses saying if you move out of their service area you can get out of all the fees, however, last time my cousin tried this it asked for proof (a bill sent to the new address or something) prior to canceling service. Shiki is right though, go into the store and ask the guys there. They can be helpful getting you out of paying that crap if they aren't pricks.

I guess you could say everything I write is kind of gay related.

My favorite condom brand!

stud

thanks again everyone! muah!

Thanks guys!

I do keep a few lower level items stocked for a rainy day request.

lol, that was pretty funny.

wb sexy, it's still the same.

Happy Birthday old man.

Ugh, I hope this idea is clear. Religion is a huge part of our laws already. We give special contractual treatment to marriages which is an instituion of religion. The same rights and privliges for two people outside of marriage takes mounds of paperwork to emulate. I am of the opinion that marriage is a way to give a tax break to people so they don't have to spend time and money doing endless paperwork to gain rights to property and monies that marriage would entitle them to. To me this indicates that our contractual system is too complex to deal with the simplicities of property ownership and Marriage agreements only increase the complexity of that system which leads our society into divorce courts when most of those disagreements should fall under property law. Child arrangements are the only place where I think we need to retain the divorce court specialization. I think we should abolish Marriage in the governments eyes. Religion will truely be separate from state contracts and religions can utilize their systems of Marriage while the government exercises contracts between two people no matter the gender or race without concern of infringing on the "sanctity" of religious marriage.

I disagree lemons, i think it's 2% outburst and 98% debate!