Joesf 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,...22491&subj=news Discuss with your true identity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valdez 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 Dear god. Way to go Bush. Government is FTW. Oh. I hate you all. Imagine me poking you in the arm all day long. Annoying? I hope so. -Jeffrey L. Ritter Jr. Do I have to post my SSN so you know who I truely am? How about a photocopy of my birth certificate? This is rediculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krotas 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 hahaha... thank all thats good in this world that i live in Canada... U HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER ME BUSH! MWHAHAHAHAHHA! srry sometimes i get carried away Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvilly 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 hahaha... thank all thats good in this world that i live in Canada... U HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER ME BUSH! MWHAHAHAHAHHA! srry sometimes i get carried away He will come for you. There is no escape from the wrath of bush Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loofa 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 did any of you read the full article, this is all our senators doing, more than 50% of them passed the bill, and the article to make "annoying people" illlegal is tucked into a bill sure to pass. they are all noobs and the law will not be enforced and cannot win against constitutional arguements, so why is it even a big deal? its not unless it does get enforced. its just another stupid law on the books no one will care about until some idiot lawyer tries to abuse it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormhelm 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 hahaha... thank all thats good in this world that i live in Canada... U HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER ME BUSH! MWHAHAHAHAHHA! srry sometimes i get carried away Canada *safe* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frost 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 whee!!! ^^ Canada Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exist2Inspire 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 w00t Canada. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeAhnPrime 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 /poke ZOMG IM A FELON!!!!!!!! this thing can not and will not stand up, if you read the entire article there is a section about a previously passed draft that was reasonable, and made sense. anyways, bush probably had nothing to do with this, for once i dont blame him, and i wont care if he accepts responsibilty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bentley 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 Canada is not safe, we will invade because we know that if your annoying you must secretly be hiding weapons of mass destruction too. Begins to sings a new song in honor of President Bush Your land is our land..... I hope this post didn't annoy any of you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siegeman 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 I tolld my friend, and he began forming a lawsuit against Bill O'Reilly. I think he probably used his name though, he likes to annoy people in public. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frost 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 OMG OMG IMA GO TELL BUSH BOUT BENTLEY ^^' YEA sure if we are hiding weapons of mass destruction? Oh yea right you kept the bills.. AHAHA ^^' jk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esteban 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 MUAHAH!!! I can annoy you but you can't annoy me! LET THE ANNOYING RAMPAGE BEGIN!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bentley 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 I can annoy you all you want I just have to sign it Jeff at the end Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormhelm 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 No bentley you don't annoy us at all (7000 general foum post!) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bentley 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 Damn I will try harder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juniorx2 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2006 I just sent the forum police to your door bentley. cu in jail muhahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garetsu 0 Report post Posted January 11, 2006 Reader comment: A government lawyer intimately familiar with the subject who requests anonymity (but whose identity is legit, and known to Boing Boing) sez, Your latest reader comment has it exactly right. The anonymous harassment provision ( Link ) is the old telephone-annoyance statute that has been on the books for decades. It was updated in the widely (and in many respects deservedly) ridiculed Communications Decency Act to include new technologies, and the cases make clear its applicability to Internet communications. See, e.g., ACLU v. Reno, 929 F. Supp. 824, 829 n.5 (E.D. Pa. 1996) (text here), aff'd, 521 U.S. 824 (1997). Unlike the indecency provisions of the CDA, this scope update was not invalidated in the courts and remains fully effective. In other words, the latest amendment, which supposedly adds Internet communications devices to the scope of the law, is meaningless surplusage. In other words: Troll away, folks. www.boingboing.net is FTW! ..If you didn't already know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joesf 0 Report post Posted January 12, 2006 This is just... I dunno... http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/0112/chat...m_suit_ctv.html Man sues chatroom pals: I was humiliated beyond what 'no man could endure' Gillespie, 53, claims that Marlowe and Bob Charpentier, a 52-year-old Oregon resident, insulted him and harassed him in the AOL chatroom called \"Romance — Older Men\" to the point where it inflicted \"severe emotional distress and physical injury that is of a nature no reasonable man could be expected to endure it.\" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts